Wednesday, February 27, 2013

16 and 4


Does art for the sake of art need a reason to exist?  If it exists solely for the sake of itself is it serving any purpose at all?  Art exists to benefit people in ways that are different for everyone.  It doesn't have to be appreciated, it doesn't have to be hated, it doesn't even have to be seen.  But if it's not seen does it exist?

No comments:

Post a Comment